Tony Sig

I recently had an interesting interaction with my former philosophy teacher. He was telling me how he went to Belgium to study Phenomenology and I confessed that I had no idea how to define or understand what exactly “Phenomenology” is. I mostly knew what it meant to “do a phenomenology of x, y or z” but I found it difficult to grasp in the abstract. In an interesting turn he replied that he didn’t know how to define “Postmodern” which is the term I am most familiar with.

Apparently there is not a straightforward connection between French style Phenomenology and “Postmodernism.”

I have noticed that there is an exceeding amount of confusion as to what “Postmodernism” is in Christian circles (let along other circles). This seems to be in no small part on account of the various ramblings of those affiliated with the so-called “Emerging/ent Church” and the many responses the movement has invoked. It doesn’t help that there is no straightforward way to understand what “It” is and one wonders if we should just move the whole conversation away from this elusive word and its plurality of meanings.

I am one who would be more than willing to drop the term itself. I don’t want to define myself as a “postmodern.” Unfortunately I have found the term to be just useful enough to justify my continued cautious use of it.

I was recently given a fair grouping of books all concerned with the intersection of Christian theology and various flavors of “postmodern” philosophy. I will be spending a few posts here and there reviewing the books and contemplating the application of their conclusions to Christian life.

I am going to save a “definition” of postmodernism until we get to a specific book that deals with the topic. My first post will be dedicated to James K A Smith’s book “Who’s Afraid of Postmodernism?: Taking Derrida, Lyotard and Foucault to Church.” I think it is a very appropriate book to start off with.

***To see even more hilarious “Motivational Posters” for the “Emerging Church” see all of Pyromaniacs posters

Reed Signature
A simple google search for “post evangelical” will return a plethora of commentary on the term (some of my favorites: the very straight forward wikipedia entry, the standby internetmonk, an open source theology thread from 2003, and our fellow ccblogger notes from off center).

It would be very silly of me to launch into a comprehensive series of posts on the idea when so much has already been explained by those more capable (and internet savvy). However, the term displays prominently at the top of our blog right next to ‘tea party’ as if we all sit around counting doilies and discussing Mr. Darcy all day long and as far as I can tell, we’ve never actually sussed out just what that means.

I am especially guilty since it would seem I consistently use this slippery word as an adjective for my position on various issues right now and just smile coyly to myself as people sitting across from me as they scramble to figure out if that’s a postmodern, emergent, postdenomentational missional thing or whether I just made it up on the spot. (In truth, it gives me an inherent sense of superiority to be “post” whatever the person is whom I’m discussing things with. Post-girlfriend anyone?)

For some odd reason probably having something to do with either Shawn Wamsley or my slick redo of our sidebar, our traffic has increased in recent weeks and I’m delighted that many of our new readers and commenters come from worldviews outside the Christian sphere. If you’re new and reading this, I hope this post is useful for you.

Everyone who contributes to this blog came to Christianity in an Evangelical movement in the United States. None of us have remained.

This is the simplest use of the term on this blog and if nothing I say after makes any sense, I suggest we just stick to it. Some of us have found new movements to join, some have left conventional Christianity altogether and others are lost somewhere in the clouds.

Our reasons for leaving are as variable as our tastes in beer, which is to say, surprisingly not quite so varied—however, full of tiny quirks unique to our own persons. Shamelessly borrowing formatting from the wikipedia article because I’m on vacation and too tired to be creative on my own, I’d like to list some of these frustrations to which many of us can attest (I’ve also decided to add Exclamation points because most of us live in Minnesota where people really don’t show enough emotion):

1. Politicization of Faith!
The G Dub years were hard for me. I was a loyal supporter before I could even vote but by the end of his eight year reign, I couldn’t figure out why people kept telling me he was Christian, and why that necessarily meant I had to vote for him. An astute reader of the blog might observe that we still discuss our political convictions using Christian rationale, just often from the other pole. I would counter that such explanations are often more complicated than simple blind “good vs. evil” comparisons and that likely a particular politician we might support involves our reasoning of “shared goals” rather than “shared convictions.”

2. Unreasonable view of Scripture!
One of the two issues on this blog that will never quite go away. I don’t have much to add here. Look around, you’ll find it.

3. Inadequate Response to Homosexual Christians!
The other of the two issues that is never far from our recent comments list. There are a variety of stances on this issue on our blog—which is something, I’m proud of.

4. Militant Exclusivism and Preoccupation with Eschatology!
For those of us who grew up in a church or movement with a vibrant missions or Evangelistic focus, this issue remains difficult. Just what does it mean to share the good news? Am I accountable if I don’t “witness” to every single person I meet? Does hell exist? Are Christians the only people who go to “heaven.” And just what is heaven? And hey, what about my Muslim friends, I like them and I think that their faith is pretty cool and I’d rather they don’t change to be completely honest. Can God make a rock so big he can’t lift it?

5. Emphasis on Personal Piety over Social Responsibility!
Disgusted by mega church opulence and prosperity nonsense, post evangelicals are afflicted by the tension between holiness and justice. Maybe those hippies who joined the Peace Corps instead of the missions trip were on to something. And seriously, just how does my memorizing another scripture verse help people dying from Malaria in Africa?

6. Disconnect From Church History!
I’ve discussed this elsewhere. Old stuff matters and Evangelicals seemed determined to separate themselves from it.

7. Separatism and Alternative Culture!
More a personal pet peeve of mine. I can’t stand alternative Christian culture, music, movies, books etc… I find it to be a cheesy and crude attempt at unnecessary and harmful separation from “the world.” Seriously, why are Christians so weird?

8. Other Stuff!
Which I’m sure you guys will add in the comments.

Finally adding “tea party” to our blog tag line was really a throwaway thing I did when first designing the site. I suppose you could say its lighthearted or a reference to our mutual friendships and enjoyment of imbibing things but really, I just threw it in there on a whim.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 201 other followers