Tony SigIt can be quite easy to remain in a state of oblivion to a wider world around you if one spends much of their time around people who value and assume the same things as you.  I had not realized it, but with respect to theology, I had come to such a point.

One day I was working on my wife’s salon (Salon Ori, whoop whoop) with my Aunt.  Now my aunt is a very intelligent Evangelical woman and has been a Christian her whole life.  She was painting mirror frames and I was putting together standing-cabinets and I was recalling to her a conversation I had overheard where one of the party had said something to the effect of, “What’s the point of a theologian anyway?”  I recalled this story with a blatant guffaw in my voice; the tone implying that such a question was obviously stupid and ignorant.  But to my own humility my aunt looked at me and replied genuinely, “What is the point?”

I didn’t really have a coherent answer.  Indeed, I’ve been thinking about that ever since.  I needed to be able to explain to someone not only why theology is important, but why theologians (I sort of plan to sort of be one) might be justifiable.  I shall briefly give two simple examples that I hope will make a simple and quite incomplete case for the importance of theology.

There is a famous scene in Plato’s Republic where “The Perfectly Just Man” is being described.  Plato is attempting to tease out whether justice is something that ought to be sought and obeyed for itself alone or for the benefits, perceived or otherwise, that it will bestow on society or ones family.  In the end, Plato imagines that this Just man would be ridiculed, scorned and finally crucified (the parallel has not been lost on Christians) for the “trouble” he would cause to society.  Plato almost certainly had his beloved Socrates in mind here and Plato’s own final verdict is that justice (and all things which are good ultimately) are in themselves worthy to pursue and need no justification.

Or take for instance the Roman Catholic theologian William Cavanaugh.  Here is a man who has been a primary editor for the massively influential, creative and sometimes utterly abstract theological journal Modern Theology; he has written a powerful book on Torture and Eucharist;” he has contributed to inter Roman Catholic discussions on ecclesiology and ecumenism; all very academic and “ivory towered” things:  Yet he also wrote a tiny little book on  the relation between economics and the Church which is easy to understand, filled with practical examples of how to practice his ideas and theologically rich.

As I see it, Theology is uniquely equipped to speak to most academic and truth-seeking conversations in an infinitely inter-disciplinary way.  Therefore, Theology is a vital and irreplaceable discourse in all searching after those things which are true and good, and so it needs no justification, no measurable utilitarian value.  It is right and good for its own sake.

Also, Theology does not always lead to arguments about “how many angels can fit on the head of a pin.”  It is highly questionable that Cavanaugh could have written his simple little book had he not spent all this time in serious and critical reflection on the Church.  I’ll agree wholeheartedly, that there is often a great gulf between what goes on in some theological journals and what the parish needs.  But to dismiss theology as some do, with a casual and ungrateful wave of the hand, having laid on theology all blame for our divisions, is to make a mistake.  Let us not cut the head from the heart (so to speak), for the Church needs eyes, it needs hands, and perhaps, it even needs theologians.

12 Propositions…#6

December 30, 2009

Tony Sig

If Isaiah 7.14 is speaking about Jesus (and it is), then Plato, in Book II, discussing the end of “The Just Man” is also speaking about Jesus.

“The ‘Just Man’ will have to endure the lash, the rack, chains, the branding-iron in his eyes, and finally, after every extremity of suffering, he will be crucified…” – Plato, Republic bk.II.362

Blog Signature

Part I Part II Part III

The Bestiary: Animals Who Think and Talk

narnia_Aslan_3_kids_others

The professor in The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe (aka Digory, Lord Digory, et al) personifies Socrates in Plato’s Republic better than any other figure among the collective writings of Tolkien, Lewis, and Rowling.  He questions Peter and Susan after they have had a fight with Edmund over Lucy’s claim to have entered Narnia through the wardrobe, asking whether they ought to believe the report of a known liar (Edmund) over that of a trustworthy person (Lucy) just because the liar’s data seemed to back up what they already believed about the world.[i]

This session with the professor is the turning point in the novel regarding Peter and Susan’s attitudes toward Lucy and the possibility that there is more to reality than the world they can perceive with their senses (a lesson they have to repeatedly learn in the series).  While the effect that traveling between parallel universes has on time is a fascinating philosophical problem within the Chronicles, the real elements of Platonic Form are found in Lewis’ Bestiary (yes, that is spelled correctly).  The talking animals of Narnia represent what it means to be the true form of the creature.  For instance, while there are non-talking (h)orses of the “normal” variety in Narnia, it is the noble, talking horses that are the “true (H)orses.”  Furthermore, though there may be true Lions of the talking sort, Aslan is The True Lion.  Once again, the desired affect is the creation of an order or system of Platonic Forms that will allow the reader to interact with important truths surrounding justice, forgiveness, and redemption.  If the forms interacting with these truths are “real forms,” then the conclusions drawn must ultimately be “real principles.”

Magic: When the Supernatural Is Ordinary

800px-Hogwarts

 Harry Potter’s journey into the wizarding world is just as much a journey into “real reality” as it is a journey to boarding school.  Rowling uses magic in much the same way that Tolkien uses items of lore and Lewis uses the bestiary.  Magic in the Harry Potter series stands in direct contrast to the technological boon that we experience on a daily basis.  Characters like Mr. Weasley, who work for Ministry of Magic, are fascinated by the gadgetry of our lives.  However, they never assume more than an anecdotal or trivial attitude toward modernization.  The life they have experienced through magic is in tune with nature, but it is not archaic.  It is, in fact, much more convenient than technology and gadgetry makes our lives in a number of ways.  All of this serves to set the stage for metaphysics and Plato’s Theory of Forms.

“Them!’ said Stan contemptuously, ‘Don’ listen properly do they?  Don’ look properly either. Never notice nuffink, they don’.”

Perhaps more than the other worlds, Rowling challenges other readers to doubt their certainty with reality by constructing her world alongside our own.  In one scene in the Prisoner of Azkaban, one character explains to Harry that muggles never notice the wizarding world (even the most outlandish behaviors and mishaps) because they are not open to anything but their own expectations.  “Them!’ said Stan contemptuously, ‘Don’ listen properly do they?  Don’ look properly either. Never notice nuffink, they don’.”  Rowling’s Platonic Forms take the form of the wizarding community itself.  They are true people in the sense that they have seen what “real” reality is and have not shied away.  It can be chaotic, untidy, and unsettling, but there is wonder in all of it.  In a sense, even education becomes part of the mystical.  Practices of the most existential or supernatural kind in our world take on the tone of the knowable, testable, and controllable in the classroom for Harry Potter.  Something that would never be a suitable conclusion to be drawn for someone like the quintessential muggle family, the Dursleys.  This is not to say that there is no danger or evil in the wizarding world.  If love and friendship can be had in their truest sense, then evil and conflict take on a danger that is much more “dangerous” than those that concern the muggle world.

 

Blog Signature

Part I Part II Part III

Items of Lore: Rings of Power, Elvish Swords, and Dwarvish Armor

TheOneRing

For Plato, true forms must be considered when selecting one’s “fundamental character.”  In order for a person to overcome the pull of an immoral life or the injustice proliferated by unbridled power, a person must understand existence in its true form.  Tolkien borrows from these themes most industriously in his lore surrounding the One Ring.  Throughout the journey of the fellowship, Frodo and crew are continuously learning of the power, and consequently of the corrupting nature, of the One Ring.  The power of the ring, then, is not that it represents the corrupting nature of limitless power, it is that nature intrinsically.  The ring functions as more than a symbol, it is an embodiment of sorts.  As such, the One Ring hearkens back to Plato’s use of true forms.  In the Lord of the Rings, the One Ring is the real object casting maleficent shadows of corrupt behavior across the “cave walls” of Middle Earth.[i] 

Tolkien’s use of Platonic Forms does not stop with the One Ring, though.  The reader is invited not only to ponder the realities behind power and corruption but also those behind valor and heroism.  In the Lord of the Rings, history has played host to an era where true forms are present in the world of the common person.  For Tolkien, there are swords and there are true swords, armor and true armor.  These true forms usually find their way into the possession of true beings, heroes.  Tolkien uses lore and christening to distinguish between weapons and armor that represent the Platonic Forms. 

These items of lore are typically the companions (even in the sense that they may actually exist as a type of person in their own right) of the story’s archetypal characters.  Gandalf the Gray wields Glamdring, a rune engraved sword that was thousands of years old by the time Gandalf enters into the affairs of the Shire.  The sword was discovered by Gandalf in the Third Age along with Orcrist and Sting (a sword later wielded by Frodo in the Fellowship of the Ring) in a troll cave.  Andúril is the sword that was forged from the remnants of Narsil (the sword that was broken when Elendil battled Sauron in the Second Age) for Aragorn.  In the book, Andúril shines with the light of the sun and moon just like its predecessor Narsil.  Finally, but certainly not exhaustively, Frodo has a shirt of Mithril gifted to him by his Uncle Bilbo.  Bilbo received the shirt from Thorin Oakenshield in The Hobbit when they defeated the dragon Smaug.  This shirt of mail felt light as silk, but could turn any blade.  It was nearly indestructible and worth more than the entire Shire.

All of these fantastic items represent the author’s desire to communicate the urgency and importance of the world that exists beyond our perception.  In an age of terror and conflict, when the world was under the threat of devastation, these items of lore in the hands of champions were the hope and the certainty of values and attributes that transcended the dim view with which many perceived the world that surrounded them.

Blog Signature

Part I Part II Part III

Here is a brief study I put together.  It is designed to synthesize some of my favorite past times.  It was directed at high school students with little exposure to philosophy.  Consequently, some of it will be far beneath the readers on this blog.  Nonetheless, it should be fun to get a discussion going regarding philosophical elements in literature.

Philosophy and Literature

Often, in human history, our most cherished philosophies are demonstrated in our most beloved literature.  Authors become the voice of the people in expressing their deepest desires, struggles, and fears.  Literature has the power to communicate truth about reality with potent symbolism, and the poetic articulation of yearnings common to human experience.  In this regard, the pen truly is mightier than the sword, even an ancient elvish sword.

The Fantasy genre (not counting the myth and fables from whence it came) has only just recently come to be appreciated by the general population; however, it has held a fiercely loyal fan base for decades.  Fantasy literature is characterized by elements of magic or the supernatural as they occur in the reality of the author’s work.  It borrows heavily from themes in ancient myth and fairy tales, and, as such, is largely predisposed to metaphysical ponderings.  Fantasy literature relies upon the philosophical axioms of metaphysics in order to create a framework for the plot, setting, or other literary elements.  This is especially true for those authors gifted enough to create entire worlds, complete with systems and rules for the magical/supernatural.  Consequently, the author can bring the reader to a true appreciation regarding the role of the supernatural in our lives today.

Therefore, it will be beneficial to explore the metaphysical structures used in the literary devices of three of Fantasy’s most prolific authors: J.R.R. Tolkien, C.S. Lewis, and J.K. Rowling.  One of the distinguishing characteristics of these authors’ novels, in a literary sense, is the expansive nature of the worlds that each created.  In a philosophical sense, they are significant because of the profound questions these worlds pose to readers about the nature of reality.  Consequently, it is not only the questions posed by the existence of these worlds alone, but also that these worlds are developed enough to account for the existence of the fantastic and are “heavy” enough to facilitate our own minds’ journeys through them.[ii] These are works of fiction that stand up to repeated readings, and have captured the imaginations of people in a diverse array of media like film, television, and video games.

The Lord of the Rings takes place in Middle-Earth, the setting for Tolkien’s “Alternate pre-history” to the human epoch on Earth.  It is a world that supposes that Elves, Dwarves, and supernatural creatures, along with their struggles, were a real, shared part of Earth’s ancient history.  While this is only one of many theories regarding Tolkien’s use of Middle-Earth as a setting (the world of middle-earth is, indeed, substantial enough to stand on its own), it creates a framework for us to evaluate the philosophical questions that Tolkien’s work seems to provoke for the reader in our reality.

“In Narnia children escaping a modern European war encounter a faun, a dwarf, a Snow Queen who is not even of that world, centaurs, a big bad wolf, talking beavers, a giant, dryads, naiads, a unicorn, a huge lion who made the land, and even Father Christmas, complete with gifts.”[iii] Narnia is not unlike middle-earth, but is an alternate reality rather than an alternate history.  Lewis, also famous for his other ventures (a science-fiction trilogy among them), literally creates Narnia in a parallel universe in the Chronicles. This parallel reality, some have argued, functions analogously for our own, especially within the Judeo-Christian worldview.  Nonetheless, Narnia poses profound questions about our own reality, especially about the nature of time and space.

Rowling’s fantasy setting actually takes place alongside our modern reality.  The wizarding world that Harry Potter enters when he is enrolled at Hogwarts School of Witchcraft and Wizardry exists hidden in our own technological age.  While Rowling has not created an alternate existence or an alternate history per se, she has created a sub-culture within the known world that is complete with all of the idiosyncrasies, rules, accoutrement, and tools of an individual society.  While the wizarding world is aware of the non-magical world (“muggles” in the book), they work tirelessly to keep themselves unnoticed by people of the non-wizarding sort.

All of these authors have, undoubtedly, set about writing a story and not a philosophical treatise.  Nonetheless, their stories operate within the bounds of a specific metaphysical disposition.  According to Kreeft, we all operate with assumptions about whether reality exists beyond the scope of our own thought, and whether that reality is perceived in its truest sense on a daily basis.[iv] To that end, these authors have led us, wittingly or not, down an important road of philosophical self-discovery.

Entering an Alternate Reality

NarniaWardrobe

To one degree or another, the world of fantasy literature owes its existence to the philosophy of Plato.  He postulated that the world we experience through our physical senses is merely a shadow of the “real” reality that remains out of our perception.  Fantasy literature utilizes this understanding of our existence as its basic premise.  The world we experience is not all that there is in the “real world.”  In the “real world,” we experience all of the things that we cannot experience in our daily lives, because of our clouded perception.  Plato’s Myth of the Cave and his Theory of Forms could ultimately be the sources of this understanding as used in Fantasy literature.

In the Myth of the Cave, Plato imagines a cave where human beings have been held captive since birth.  They are chained down in such a way that they can only see the wall of the cave.  They cannot see the sky, heavens, or each other.  Consequently, the only thing they know about their world comes from the shadows that are cast onto the wall as objects are passed in front of a fire by their captors in the cave.  These shadows, then, are the only means by which the prisoners know reality.

Plato then asks the reader to imagine what it would be like for one of those prisoners, if the captors showed them any of the objects that had been casting shadows on the wall.  Surely, the prisoner would reject the true form of the object as trickery, and, having only ever known the shadows and not expecting anything else to exist beyond them, would insist that the shadows are indeed reality.  Plato then goes through a series of questions asking the reader to imagine what would happen if the prisoner was subsequently (for the first time in their existence) stood up, shown the fire, and taken outside.  Tolkien, Lewis, and Rowling have essentially done just that.  They have created a world that allows us to exit our cave of perception and interact with ideas/objects in their true form (Platonic Forms from here on).

In order for these authors to have substantive interaction with what truly constitutes reality, they would ultimately have to take the reader to a place where Platonic Forms are present alongside (or in some cases in the place of) our mere perception of forms.  Consequently, their worlds are certainly significant literary accomplishments, but also represent a story telling tool that enables the reader to interact with the philosophical quandaries introduced by Plato.  The reader of fantasy literature is able to interrelate with platonic ideas at a much more intuitive level through their interaction with narrative than they would otherwise have the ability to do in some academic setting.  This is ultimately the ageless value and strength of the narrative: ordinary people can become part of complex and important contemplation though they may lack the ability to articulate such concepts in other settings.   Consequently, this will prove to be one of the crucial values of the literary works of authors like Tolkien, Lewis, and Rowling.

As such, each author has /1/ provided a gateway for each reader to enter their world and /2/ created a system of Forms (in the Platonic sense) in order to challenge our thinking and assumptions.[iv] For Tolkien, the gateway is history and he uses items of power to represent Platonic Forms; he provides not only a backdrop for our own reality but also a reality that has eons of its own ancient history.  For Lewis, the gateway is the Wardrobe and he uses talking animals to represent Platonic Forms; he gives the reader an initial point of entry that provides a clear distinction between our world and the other (which is the closest parallel of the three to Plato’s Myth of the Cave).  For Rowling, the gateways are both Platform 9 3/4 and Diagon Alley and she uses magic to represent Platonic Forms; she provides a means to see past the veil of secrecy surrounding a reality hidden from muggle eyes.


[iv] Each author actually incorporates several elements that do the work of Platonic Forms.  However, for the sake of scope and time I have limited this discussion to one of the more prominent elements in each of the author’s writing.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 201 other followers