Tony SigSo long as one is drudging themselves through the process of acquiring basic linguistic skills, fantasizing about future research projects can provide the necessary motivation to continue to drudge.  I already have a running list of books and articles that I’m “going” to write and the other day I posted one of my ideas on Twitter and Facebook,

“Of Pilgrimage and Handkerchiefs: The Implicit Sacramental Ontology of Classical Pentecostalism”

Reactions hovered around amazement at my astute imagination.  But our long time reader George P Wood asked the perennial question:  “How does this move the missional ball down the Kingdom field?”

The funny thing is that I feel this has huge implications for missions and ecumenism.  I realized that it maybe was time for me to clarify a bit more why I wish to continue to engage Pentecostalism and perhaps even hint at some of my own hopes future academic work.  So here are a few of my persistent thoughts on Pentecostalism and what I hope to do about them..  I am more than aware that I might ‘accomplish’ little of this but I figure it’s more fun at least to plan big and trim as the situations require than stew in perpetual uncertainty like a fourth year sophmore who has changed majors six times.

For the sake of clarity I always attempt to differentiate between “Pentecostals” and “Charismatics” even if the difference is blurred.  Consider it heuristic.  Charismatics are those in Mainline, Catholic and other historic churches who experience(d) and promote(d) the “charismatic gifts and experiences” (thought of more narrowly as the type normally associated with “Pentecostals”) and Pentecostals are those Protestants who look to various ‘revivals’ which happened roughly a century ago for their roots.  They are also generally differentiated by idiosynchratic eschtologies.

  • It seems clear based on the unique rise and spread of Pentecostals that it is a work of the Spirit.  If it is, then it is incumbent on the whole Church to ‘get on board’ with it, though with discernment.  This is really just another way of saying that the charismatic gifts of the Spirit are for the whole Church.
  • So I hope to work ecumenically with Pentecostals and encourage the use of the charismatic gifts in the wider Church.
  • This engagement is hindered by several things:
  • Pentecostals have historically been skeptical of ecumenism.  They have been especially hostile to Catholics and Mainline Christians and have tended to feed this with an etiological narrative that sees in intellectualism and liberalism (among other things) a “fall” from the Spirit.  So the “start” of Pentecostalism is seen as Gods judgment that the rest of the Church has failed and so is better ignored and left behind than looked to as partners and teachers.  This has also borne fruit as anti-intellectualism, anti-institutionalism and anti-tradition.
  • So part of what I want to do is demonstrate how under the surface of Pentecostal experience and practice there is a substantive overlap with Catholic Christian theology, experience and practice.  By doing this I can help prepare the ground for fruitful dialogue between pentecostal and other churches as well as for cooperation in mission.
  • On the other hand, despite initial flowering in various charismatic renewals, other churches still often remain skeptical of pentecostalism on the grounds that it is anti-intellectual, anti-institutional and anti-traditional and just plain ‘weird.’  So by speaking the historic theological language of the Church, I hope to show how the whole Church needs to be renewed by the Charismatic work of the Spirit.
  • Additionally I’d like to explore the future of anglo-catholicism and argue that only a charismatic anglo-catholicism can de-clericalize the movement and renew a focus on missions and the sacraments.
  • I’d also be interested in exploring the historic three-fold ministerial order, and ‘laws of ecclesiastical polity’ in general, with reference to the charismatic gifts.
  • Similarly I’d like to look into the charismatic theology of the Eastern Orthodox because I’ve often found that their theology of the Spirit connects brilliantly with Pentecostal experience.
  • I’ve got a million more of these.
  • Another minor premise of mine that is rather disconnected to the points I’ve already made is that Pentecostals have done us all a disservice by selling their soul to buy street cred with Evangelicals.  So even now Pentecostals need a Charismatic renewal!  Especially with respect to how they read Scripture.

A basic underlying premise of all this is that Pentecostals are right in certain things and can enhance and be part of a larger renewing work of the Spirit who is reconciling all things to Christ, but in many things she is young and wrong and needs the whole Church to teach her.

Tony Sig

I’ve been known for periodically maligning “Evangelicalism” and even “Pentecostalism” in various blog posts.  But, as I feel quite strongly about a potential future in Anglican/Orthodox and Anglican/Pentecostal work, I am far from having a uniformly small opinion of Pentecostals.  Indeed, I think it would be rather blind not to believe that, despite certain evil manifestations (“Health & Wealth” or various Trinitarian heresy), God has indeed given the Church a “wind” from the Spirit.

So I wanted to make mention of a few things that Pentecostals have to teach us, keeping in mind that I attempt to use “Pentecostal” in such a way as to describe Pentecostalism understood through historical churches rather than as anybody who expresses Charismatic gifts.  Always remember that Charismatic Christians of various denominations from Catholics to Anglicans are growing along with Pentecostals (which leads me to believe that Charismatization need not accompany bad eschatology, but I digress)

  • I am not an Evangelist, or at least I’d make a poor one and I’ve always been uncomfortable with it.  But churches that grow are churches that evangelize and/or send missionaries.  With the globalization of Christianity it is to be preferred that evangelism be done by the local church rather than by us Westerners, but the huge priority of Mission (almost never connected to lame trendy words like “Missional”) in Pentecostalism is a judgement on those Churches who feel no need to evangelize, or worse, find such a thing intolerable or unnecessary.
  • Pentecostals were post-critical before it was cool or justified epistemologically.  It forces us to attend to the Texts instead of “spiritualizing” bits of the NT which grate against rationalist nerves.
  • Pentecostals aren’t afraid to go all Amos 5 on our liturgical asses
  • Prayers for healing and manifestations of the “charismatic” gifts are something that all churches should practice (don’t choke the Holy Spirit)
  • Pentecostals don’t neglect “the laity”
  • Pentecostals have played a significant role in reminding us that God is Trinity – “We believe in the Holy Spirit, the Lord, the Giver or Life, who proceeds from the Father (and the …?), with the Father and the Son s/he is worshipped and glorified.”
  • Pentecostals are unafraid of not just “helping the poor” but “being the poor.”  Go into inner cities and who’s doing a most of the work with “minorities” and immigrants?  There is a sort of slight embarrassment for me in being in what is often thought of as the white religion of the bourgeoisie in America.

Don’t get me wrong, I think that Pentecostalism has a LOT to learn from the church Catholic and historic.  One hopes that as a movement it will be incorporated into the historic bodies, but that’s another list.  Until then…Go Pentecostals!

Reed Signature
I had to write this short bio for a Sys. Theo. class and thought I would repost it here.

I’m twenty-five years old and I grew up in the south suburbs of St. Paul. I was raised Pentecostal and came to faith at Oak Hills Church in Eagan, MN—a church my parents planted when I was five. Oak Hills was heavily influenced by the Willow Creek model and consequently I grew up with an outreach-focused mindset but was unfamiliar with hymns, liturgy or the creeds (my church met in public schools for most of my life and we didn’t have an organ, an alter or a choir).

I felt called to work in the Church when I was quite young and volunteered in the children and youth ministries as well as took numerous short term missions trips to Eastern Europe as a high school student. I attended North Central University in downtown Minneapolis in the Pastoral Studies B.A. program (essentially a mini-M. Div.) with the intention of getting ordained as an Assemblies of God minister and perhaps becoming a missionary in Eastern Europe.

My first two years of college were a difficult time as I started exploring my faith more critically and became dissatisfied with some of the answers provided by my tradition. I decided to take a year off from school and moved to England to intern at a non-profit called Next Level International which worked in former communist nations. This year abroad changed me in more ways than this space could allow. A short list includes 1) my exposure to real poverty and thus my re-evaluating my perspective on vocation, 2) my reading a lot of books and discovering that I actually enjoyed studying and 3) my experiencing worship in beautiful Anglican and Eastern Orthodox churches and realizing there was a whole world of Christian history and tradition I’d never experienced.

After returning home I continued exploring these new passions. I completed my degree but realized I couldn’t become ordained in the Assemblies of God. I took a year off after graduation to discern my future. During that year I started attending an Episcopalian church and was eventually confirmed. I read a lot of N.T. Wright and realized I enjoyed teaching more than anything else in the world.

As of today, I hope to be college professor someday and have adventures on the side like Indiana Jones. I’m fascinated by biblical literature and chose to focus in Old Testament partially due to my infatuation with narrative, partially because Hebrew is way cooler than Greek and partially due to my adoration for an influential OT professor I had as an undergrad. I’m open to ordination in the Episcopal Church, but that is a long discernment process and I feel I’ve only just become an Anglican and have much to learn.

One final thing: I have little experience with Lutherans and chose this seminary both because of the strength of its Bible program and it’s proximity to my home. Fall semester was my best ever (both in terms of academics and enjoying what I’m studying) and for this class, I’m looking forward to someone finally explaining to me what “Law and Gospel” means.

Oral Roberts, 1918-2009

December 15, 2009

At 91 years of age, the (in)famous Pastor Oral Roberts came to be present to the Lord today.  Roberts was one of the first preachers to really run with the so-called “Prosperity Gospel” and turned it into an evangelical empire consisting of even a University.

There can be no question that most on this blog consider the Prosperity Gospel to be no gospel at all.  It is certainly not the gospel of Christ who called out his ministry quoting Isaiah:

“The Spirit of the Lord is upon me,
because he has anointed me
to bring good news to the poor.
He has sent me to proclaim release to the captives
and recovery of sight to the blind,
to let the oppressed go free,
to proclaim the year of the Lord’s favour.”
- NRSV

Christ’s burden is one of freedom, but also of suffering.  And those who accept the Good News are not promised material wealth but are incorporated into the eternal self-offering of the Son to the Father.

But, there is no question that Roberts was still an evangelist and undoubtedly there are a great many people who have come to saving faith on account of his preaching.

He was, as we all are, a mixed up batch of faithfulness and faithlessness.

Resquiescat in Pacem pastor Roberts.

A Note On Heritage

October 16, 2009

Reed Signature
My mother was organizing some old papers from her parent’s home this week and discovered a tattered sheet of notebook paper written by my Grandma Marguerite who died last January. The short testimony describes how my grandma became a Christian. I’d grown up hearing the story from both women—but to see it written out gave it a special gravity for me. Below are the documents and my best deciphering of the faded handwriting.

Side I
Got saved in my home in
Dec. of 1948 – Seeking The Lord
deep [by myself?], The Lord all in White
appeared to me in the sky + said
Come unto me, With peace I was
saved. Didn’t realize what it
was at the time. I kept seeking
the good Lord with all my heart
+ on Oct. 10th, 1947 he baptized me
with power of Holy Ghost. I [?]
I started to go the nearest church
that believed in Spk. in Tongues Fremont Tabernacle
assembly 1949 Oct.
Side II
the Lord gave me the
scripture in John 17. [?] + [Tw?] 23

1996-1948=48 years saved*

I heard Billy Graham right after I
got saved, a few days or couple days. Then
I knew as the H.S. showed me
what Billy G. was preaching was
what happened to be,
At first I knelt down to ask Jesus
in my heart after listening to B.G. but
thats when The Holy S. showed thats what happened to me already

* we think she wrote this in 1996 and was doing the math

My mom and I enjoyed going over these notes together and telling stories about my Grandma. She’d grown up without any Christian influences. She became a Roman Catholic when she married my Italian Grandpa and ended up going to Mass more than he did. The experiences she described above (as I remember her telling the stories) happened completely unprovoked while reading her Bible alone. They sparked my grandmother to announce to her priest that she was leaving the Catholic Church and joining up with the Pentecostal crowd at Fremont Tabernacle down the road.

It’s one half of my family’s A/G past and it eventually led to my grandpa’s conversion and my mother and aunt’s marrying A/G ministers. These are powerful stories that have defined the way our family talks about God and Faith.

I’m left feeling a bit nostalgic and little confused. This is my heritage and I’m proud of it—and yet I’m continuing in what would appear to be a decidedly un-pentecostal path.

Next month I’m getting confirmed in the Episcopal Church and I’m visiting an Anglican Seminary next week. Where is the connection between my family’s faith experiences and my own journey out of the Assemblies God into a Catholic body like Anglicanism? Am I betraying their legacy? Changing it? Contextualizing it? What would Grandma think?

These are the persistent questions I’m sure I’ll live with for the rest of my life.

Tony SigA very high percentage of Pastors Kids end up falling away from faith.  Some forever, some for a period of time after which they reluctantly come back because they would feel it a crime to keep their kids from the transcendence which they had experienced as a child.

The pressure can be pretty tough.  You are expected to be perfect in all that you do.  Having been raised in a small town, even people who don’t go to my church knew that I was a Pastor’s kid, and I was supposed to be different.  Your zeal for God must be greater and more steady than the rank-and-file youth in the Youth Group.  It is assumed you will be a leader of some sort whether in worship or prayer or whatever.

I was a sort of Renaissance PK.  From when I was 15 I was “leading worship” for the Youth Group.  I led prayer and bible study groups and I was the model of a holiness/pentecostal:  I never swore, I never drank, I never smoked and I didn’t sleep around.  Like Paul, I could (and did – in my head) say that I was “blameless” as goes the law.  I don’t suppose that if I had ever been asked I would have said I was a “good” Christian, but I would be lying if I said that I wasn’t a little bit judgemental of Christians who weren’t as “good as me”.

Especially those Catholics and Lutherans with their drinking and un-evangelical way of talking about faith.  All that “confirmation” and “eucharist,” sounds like idol worship to me, but whatever.

After high school I joined a “discipleship program” that the Assemblies has called “Master’s Commission.”  I would describe it, but it is difficult to do, and I don’t much like to talk about those “lost years” of mine.  Though, ironically, my experiences in this program were to forever change me.

One of the most intense moments of change was when a group of us took a trip down to Urbana Illinois to do “street witnessing” on the college campus there. There were several hundred people who gathered from various places around the country and we converged on the campus en masse. (Perhaps another day I can describe how all my “street witnessing” changed my idea of evangelism, but we’ll save that one)  After a day of attempting to convince random college kids that they were destined for hell we would re-assemble at a local church and have good ole’ fashioned holy ghost services.

On one particular night the service focused on “repentance.”  During the “altar time” people began to spontaneously confess their sins out loud to the congregation – Describing Pentecostal worship to those who have never partaken is rather like attempting to describe an alien world.  Let’s just say that it is several hours of increasing emotional intensity.  Though that is not entirely fair, it’s not pure “emotionalism;” but the senses are very involved and one does not need to pass everything over a “reasonableness-meter.”  It is transcendent.  – I was one who confessed aloud if you will; after which my pastor laid hands on me and began to pray.

I sort of “faked” being “slain in the Spirit” (where one falls down and lies semi-concious on the floor) once when I was a kid.  I felt the need to sort of “be spiritual.”  But I had since sworn off on the phenomenon.  Over the years I had become increasingly uncomfortable with the more overt Pentecostal phenomenon.  But on this night, without provocation, I felt weak after my pastor began to pray for me.  I “fell back” and was laid out on my back.  Lying there was sort of like being in a dream.  I was able to see and sense all that was going on around me, but my mind was incredibly focused.

Though not audibly, but with that kind clarity, I was overwhelmed by a “voice,” but it wasn’t a voice.

(here I wish I had the ability of St. John of the Cross to poetically describe the experience, but I sort of suck at writing so bear with me).  However one describes it I fel two very intense feelings simultaneously.  I was, for the first time I can remember, completely aware of my sin.  Perhaps I didn’t swear and drink, but I was filled with pride and arrogance.  I almost felt like I was being shown a laundry list of my own sinfullness.  Yet, at the same time, sort of like a flood of water over and around me, but warm and not wet, I was keenly aware of being unconditionally loved with a steadfast and indescribable fidelity.

From that day a lifetime of self-righteousness began to slowly chip away.  It’s not done yet!  But I know that had I not understood the need to be repentant, I could not love God or love my neighbor, or know that I was loved by God.  Sometimes I had heard people speak this way before I had this experience and I would think that they just needed to live in grace.  But it seems to me that the two are interconnected.

Receiving and living by grace is inseparable from a life of repentance, without which it is impossible not to judge others.

Repentance has had the effect of constantly reminding me how dependent I am and ever renews and restores right-relationship to God and my fellow Christian.

I hope not that a reader might get some sort of cliche mini-sermon attatched to a story, like some new seminary grad strategicaly using a story to communicate something other than the thrust of the narrative.  In the end, the story of that night, of repentence, was the only thing that prepared me for new life, and I imagine that this prepared me to better appreciate Lent.  This is in fact the first time I have ever actually taken on a “holy lent,” and I look forward to it.

Healing and Honesty

February 13, 2009

Tony SigI should be doing homework.  I should also finish my second post on pluralism.  But Tony’s (the other Tony) posts have brought up many of my own rememberences of growing up Pentecostal and I wanted to chime in.

It will become obvious that I largely agree with Tony.  Although we do await at least another post on this topic.

Stories Pentecostals Tell:

It would not be an overexageration to say that Pentecostals are most united around the absolutely foundational and strong assertion that the “spiritual gifts” (ala-I Cor 12-14) are meant to be available today.  Not only this, but they should be the normative mode of Christian operation.  There are some common eschatological readings of scripture and a common vocabulary, but they only serve to underscore the intensely held belief stated above.

And so all of lifes experiences are filtered through this foundational belief.  In this way everything becomes miraculous.  Got a great parking space?  God did it.  Cantaloupe on sale?  God did it.  Cold went away? God did it

It seems to me that is how, in spite of contrary evidence, a Pentecostal still holds tightly to a miraculous-as-normative outlook.  “Sure, we haven’t seen limbs regrown, but my fever was healed.”

Enter the Missionary.  The Missionary is like the rock-star of the Pentecostal world.  They are the givers of hope to a hopeless West, they are the ones with real faith, the paragon of holy-ghost power.  We could be like them, we just needed more faith.  Because miraculous things always seemed to happen elsewhere (as Tony pointed out)

Like Tony, I slowly began to become skeptical.  I became increasingly upset when there was a lady in a wheelchair who attended our church for some years.  She was sort of a watershed for me.  Because I believed it so strongly I couldn’t understand for the life of me why she was still in a wheelchair.  I just wanted to scream at my elders “Heal her dammit!”  This healing thing is real right?  We just need more faith.  Put some oil on her and she should be running across the stage and we should testify at work and “revival” is gonna come to this town.  Cause these are the “last days” and Barack Obama is going to rebuild the temple and stand in the midst of it and proclaim himself god!  So we better get healing.

The problem only became exasterbated with the “revivals” going on around the country.  In my time is was Brownsville, just recently it was Lake-something in Florida.  So people would go to these revivals to recieve “the annointing” and come back expecting to give that same annointing back and we too could experience a revival. . . But those revivals never came. We just needed more faith. And the other ones all fell down in disaster.  Moral and economic failures seem to hover like scavenger birds over these pentecostal hotbeds.

Over time it all built up.  Revivals, healings, miracles; they all happen elsewhere.  And the reason we don’t have them here is because we don’t have enough faith.  One day I finally said:  This is bullcrap!  I can assure you, I at least had the faith of a mustard seed as a kid and teenager, and Jesus said that it should be enough, but obviously it isn’t, so something has got to give.  And it was the pentecostal hermeneutic which gave.

I still have faith in the power and desire of God to heal.  But when and why it seems to happen, and why it is shrouded in mystery is not something I am willing to speculate on anymore.  I don’t worry about how much faith I have.  I just pray, like the father in Mark “I believe, help my unbelief!”  I know that my brother who was massively hit by a car experienced a miraculous recovery, of that I have no doubt at all.  I know that some peoples cancers are healed, but not all are.

In the New Testament, healing on Jesus’ part seemed to entail a recovery of the social outcast back into the people of God as part of the coming Kingdom and eschatological renewal.  That is how I frame my prayers for healing theologically.  Frankly, until the advent of modern medicine, death and suffering were a much larger part of our society, and the “life in victory” ideas behind much pentecostal preaching fails to comprehend what life under the Cross might mean.  Indeed, the worlds poor and suffering are dying of treatable diseases!  Bono put it this way -

“You speak of signs and wonders, but I need something other, I would believe if I was able, but I’m waiting for the crumbs from your table”Crumbs from Your Table – How to Dismantle an Atomic Bomb

Rather than a miracle, they just need a pill, or a clean well, or national debt relief and fair trade.  That’s a miracle we can give.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 201 other followers