Blog Signature

I promise to include only one spoiler in this review, and I’ll include it right in the beginning – *Spoiler Alert*- the book is still better than the movie. Frankly, that’s saying something, because I loved this movie. While I’m being frank, allow me also to say that I was nonplussed with many elements of the J.K. Rowling’s seventh and final installment of the Potter saga the first time I read it – which should add a little extra chutzpah to my claim that the book is still better. Those constitute a whole lot of unqualified claims, so allow me to elaborate for a moment.

First, when I received the book, I received it at my home at the earliest possible moment that Amazon could get it there. For days leading up to the release, I did not go out and buy it. I did not watch the television. I did not listen to the radio. I surfed the web as if I genuinely appreciated the present danger of the perverts that lurk on the internet. Perverts that had already been going to all varieties of places, public and private, doing their dead best to leak key plot points that they had stolen. I was cloistered in my home pacing the floors, waiting for the UPS truck. When the book finally arrived, I barely restrained myself from kissing the delivery man. He gave me a wary look that revealed he had already narrowly dodged one too many exuberant outbursts for the day. I brought the box to the kitchen table, and tore into the package greedily. I tossed the bubble wrap to my sons as a kind of consolation toy, a weak apology for the fact that daddy would not be interacting with anyone for twenty-four hours.

I started reading at 5:00 pm on the Saturday after release, and seven hours later my eyes ached and I had to go to bed. I woke up Sunday morning and groaned at the day ahead of me: church and a pot-luck luncheon where I would have to interact with friends that had bought the book at release thirty-six hours earlier. I feel guilty now, but had no shame then – I read through the sermon, I read while standing in the foyer “greeting” parishioners. I made my wife drive, and I read in the car. After approximately thirteen hours of reading, I finished the book. I will say that next to frantic Greek expositions and theological responses to journal articles, I have never read as voraciously, as determinedly. It held my attention, and I ached to know what would happen. No movie has ever had such an impact on me. However, one thought, more than any other, ran through my head the entire time I was reading: “We’re camping in the forest again? Seriously?”

This is a great place to transition to the movie, because this is the kind of pacing issue that the movie handles much better than the book. The movie opens on an ominous note, the Minister of Magic is assuring the wizarding world that everything is under control. What ensues, the movie captures better than the book did (at least, what I remember of the book in my paranoia driven, frantic reading of the text); there is an obvious homage being paid to the horrors that befell those on the wrong end of ethnic cleansing in places like Russia and Germany in the twentieth century. The movie uses props, leaflets and propaganda, which are eerily similar to those of Russian provenance, proclaiming the dangers of life with “Muggles” and “Mudbloods.”

In fact, next to the pacing of the lonely foray into camping (and make no mistake, there is still a lull in the middle of the movie for this element) I was most impressed with the movie for bringing new elements into focus. J.K. Rowling has not received enough acclaim for her clear messages of human rights and social justice. I have been frustrated with the movies up until TDH part 1, because they seemed to ignore completely the fact that Harry is battling against an ideology of racial supremacy as much as he is battling against “dark” magic. However, there is gold to be mined in the visual extravaganza that modern movies can produce – and there is no better candidate than the fantasy genre for such displays. The film is beautiful, like the others, but instead of an action packed, adventure ride, you get a film full of emotional tension. The film produces a genuine sense of dread; in fact, I felt that some of the flashy, action sequences interrupted the story being told.

The movie stumbles a little with its focus on the three friends. Radcliffe, Grint, and Watson perform amiably (actually, one of the movies’ most touching scenes has Radcliffe acting opposite a CGI puppet), but the absence of the supporting cast is felt. Still, Emma Watson performs the hell out of her role as Hermione. There is a particularly gut wrenching scene where Bellatrix is torturing Hermione in the Malfoy mansion that left me squirming in my seat. Once the know-it-all, Watson’s Hermione is light years more mature than Harry and Ron, which makes the romance between Ron and Hermione endearing instead of tiresome. The performances capture a genuine, and deep love between all three friends.

Finally, Dobby the elf steals the movie. I was sitting in the theater watching Dobby stare the Malfoys down and proclaim that he was a free elf, rescuing his friends, thinking “it’s about time we see this theme in the movies.” For those that have seen the movie or read the book, you know what happens next. It was absolutely “the moment” in the film, when he proclaimed that he was with his friends and was finally a happy, free elf. I cried. I “misted up,” reading the book – but the scene is done so well that I absolutely cried in the theater. Though, I did not cry for Dobby as much as I cried for what his sacrifice represented, and I was relieved to finally see the real value of Rowling’s literature played out on the big screen.

Blog Signature

Part I Part II Part III

The Bestiary: Animals Who Think and Talk

narnia_Aslan_3_kids_others

The professor in The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe (aka Digory, Lord Digory, et al) personifies Socrates in Plato’s Republic better than any other figure among the collective writings of Tolkien, Lewis, and Rowling.  He questions Peter and Susan after they have had a fight with Edmund over Lucy’s claim to have entered Narnia through the wardrobe, asking whether they ought to believe the report of a known liar (Edmund) over that of a trustworthy person (Lucy) just because the liar’s data seemed to back up what they already believed about the world.[i]

This session with the professor is the turning point in the novel regarding Peter and Susan’s attitudes toward Lucy and the possibility that there is more to reality than the world they can perceive with their senses (a lesson they have to repeatedly learn in the series).  While the effect that traveling between parallel universes has on time is a fascinating philosophical problem within the Chronicles, the real elements of Platonic Form are found in Lewis’ Bestiary (yes, that is spelled correctly).  The talking animals of Narnia represent what it means to be the true form of the creature.  For instance, while there are non-talking (h)orses of the “normal” variety in Narnia, it is the noble, talking horses that are the “true (H)orses.”  Furthermore, though there may be true Lions of the talking sort, Aslan is The True Lion.  Once again, the desired affect is the creation of an order or system of Platonic Forms that will allow the reader to interact with important truths surrounding justice, forgiveness, and redemption.  If the forms interacting with these truths are “real forms,” then the conclusions drawn must ultimately be “real principles.”

Magic: When the Supernatural Is Ordinary

800px-Hogwarts

 Harry Potter’s journey into the wizarding world is just as much a journey into “real reality” as it is a journey to boarding school.  Rowling uses magic in much the same way that Tolkien uses items of lore and Lewis uses the bestiary.  Magic in the Harry Potter series stands in direct contrast to the technological boon that we experience on a daily basis.  Characters like Mr. Weasley, who work for Ministry of Magic, are fascinated by the gadgetry of our lives.  However, they never assume more than an anecdotal or trivial attitude toward modernization.  The life they have experienced through magic is in tune with nature, but it is not archaic.  It is, in fact, much more convenient than technology and gadgetry makes our lives in a number of ways.  All of this serves to set the stage for metaphysics and Plato’s Theory of Forms.

“Them!’ said Stan contemptuously, ‘Don’ listen properly do they?  Don’ look properly either. Never notice nuffink, they don’.”

Perhaps more than the other worlds, Rowling challenges other readers to doubt their certainty with reality by constructing her world alongside our own.  In one scene in the Prisoner of Azkaban, one character explains to Harry that muggles never notice the wizarding world (even the most outlandish behaviors and mishaps) because they are not open to anything but their own expectations.  “Them!’ said Stan contemptuously, ‘Don’ listen properly do they?  Don’ look properly either. Never notice nuffink, they don’.”  Rowling’s Platonic Forms take the form of the wizarding community itself.  They are true people in the sense that they have seen what “real” reality is and have not shied away.  It can be chaotic, untidy, and unsettling, but there is wonder in all of it.  In a sense, even education becomes part of the mystical.  Practices of the most existential or supernatural kind in our world take on the tone of the knowable, testable, and controllable in the classroom for Harry Potter.  Something that would never be a suitable conclusion to be drawn for someone like the quintessential muggle family, the Dursleys.  This is not to say that there is no danger or evil in the wizarding world.  If love and friendship can be had in their truest sense, then evil and conflict take on a danger that is much more “dangerous” than those that concern the muggle world.

 

Blog Signature

Part I Part II Part III

Items of Lore: Rings of Power, Elvish Swords, and Dwarvish Armor

TheOneRing

For Plato, true forms must be considered when selecting one’s “fundamental character.”  In order for a person to overcome the pull of an immoral life or the injustice proliferated by unbridled power, a person must understand existence in its true form.  Tolkien borrows from these themes most industriously in his lore surrounding the One Ring.  Throughout the journey of the fellowship, Frodo and crew are continuously learning of the power, and consequently of the corrupting nature, of the One Ring.  The power of the ring, then, is not that it represents the corrupting nature of limitless power, it is that nature intrinsically.  The ring functions as more than a symbol, it is an embodiment of sorts.  As such, the One Ring hearkens back to Plato’s use of true forms.  In the Lord of the Rings, the One Ring is the real object casting maleficent shadows of corrupt behavior across the “cave walls” of Middle Earth.[i] 

Tolkien’s use of Platonic Forms does not stop with the One Ring, though.  The reader is invited not only to ponder the realities behind power and corruption but also those behind valor and heroism.  In the Lord of the Rings, history has played host to an era where true forms are present in the world of the common person.  For Tolkien, there are swords and there are true swords, armor and true armor.  These true forms usually find their way into the possession of true beings, heroes.  Tolkien uses lore and christening to distinguish between weapons and armor that represent the Platonic Forms. 

These items of lore are typically the companions (even in the sense that they may actually exist as a type of person in their own right) of the story’s archetypal characters.  Gandalf the Gray wields Glamdring, a rune engraved sword that was thousands of years old by the time Gandalf enters into the affairs of the Shire.  The sword was discovered by Gandalf in the Third Age along with Orcrist and Sting (a sword later wielded by Frodo in the Fellowship of the Ring) in a troll cave.  Andúril is the sword that was forged from the remnants of Narsil (the sword that was broken when Elendil battled Sauron in the Second Age) for Aragorn.  In the book, Andúril shines with the light of the sun and moon just like its predecessor Narsil.  Finally, but certainly not exhaustively, Frodo has a shirt of Mithril gifted to him by his Uncle Bilbo.  Bilbo received the shirt from Thorin Oakenshield in The Hobbit when they defeated the dragon Smaug.  This shirt of mail felt light as silk, but could turn any blade.  It was nearly indestructible and worth more than the entire Shire.

All of these fantastic items represent the author’s desire to communicate the urgency and importance of the world that exists beyond our perception.  In an age of terror and conflict, when the world was under the threat of devastation, these items of lore in the hands of champions were the hope and the certainty of values and attributes that transcended the dim view with which many perceived the world that surrounded them.

Blog Signature

Part I Part II Part III

Here is a brief study I put together.  It is designed to synthesize some of my favorite past times.  It was directed at high school students with little exposure to philosophy.  Consequently, some of it will be far beneath the readers on this blog.  Nonetheless, it should be fun to get a discussion going regarding philosophical elements in literature.

Philosophy and Literature

Often, in human history, our most cherished philosophies are demonstrated in our most beloved literature.  Authors become the voice of the people in expressing their deepest desires, struggles, and fears.  Literature has the power to communicate truth about reality with potent symbolism, and the poetic articulation of yearnings common to human experience.  In this regard, the pen truly is mightier than the sword, even an ancient elvish sword.

The Fantasy genre (not counting the myth and fables from whence it came) has only just recently come to be appreciated by the general population; however, it has held a fiercely loyal fan base for decades.  Fantasy literature is characterized by elements of magic or the supernatural as they occur in the reality of the author’s work.  It borrows heavily from themes in ancient myth and fairy tales, and, as such, is largely predisposed to metaphysical ponderings.  Fantasy literature relies upon the philosophical axioms of metaphysics in order to create a framework for the plot, setting, or other literary elements.  This is especially true for those authors gifted enough to create entire worlds, complete with systems and rules for the magical/supernatural.  Consequently, the author can bring the reader to a true appreciation regarding the role of the supernatural in our lives today.

Therefore, it will be beneficial to explore the metaphysical structures used in the literary devices of three of Fantasy’s most prolific authors: J.R.R. Tolkien, C.S. Lewis, and J.K. Rowling.  One of the distinguishing characteristics of these authors’ novels, in a literary sense, is the expansive nature of the worlds that each created.  In a philosophical sense, they are significant because of the profound questions these worlds pose to readers about the nature of reality.  Consequently, it is not only the questions posed by the existence of these worlds alone, but also that these worlds are developed enough to account for the existence of the fantastic and are “heavy” enough to facilitate our own minds’ journeys through them.[ii] These are works of fiction that stand up to repeated readings, and have captured the imaginations of people in a diverse array of media like film, television, and video games.

The Lord of the Rings takes place in Middle-Earth, the setting for Tolkien’s “Alternate pre-history” to the human epoch on Earth.  It is a world that supposes that Elves, Dwarves, and supernatural creatures, along with their struggles, were a real, shared part of Earth’s ancient history.  While this is only one of many theories regarding Tolkien’s use of Middle-Earth as a setting (the world of middle-earth is, indeed, substantial enough to stand on its own), it creates a framework for us to evaluate the philosophical questions that Tolkien’s work seems to provoke for the reader in our reality.

“In Narnia children escaping a modern European war encounter a faun, a dwarf, a Snow Queen who is not even of that world, centaurs, a big bad wolf, talking beavers, a giant, dryads, naiads, a unicorn, a huge lion who made the land, and even Father Christmas, complete with gifts.”[iii] Narnia is not unlike middle-earth, but is an alternate reality rather than an alternate history.  Lewis, also famous for his other ventures (a science-fiction trilogy among them), literally creates Narnia in a parallel universe in the Chronicles. This parallel reality, some have argued, functions analogously for our own, especially within the Judeo-Christian worldview.  Nonetheless, Narnia poses profound questions about our own reality, especially about the nature of time and space.

Rowling’s fantasy setting actually takes place alongside our modern reality.  The wizarding world that Harry Potter enters when he is enrolled at Hogwarts School of Witchcraft and Wizardry exists hidden in our own technological age.  While Rowling has not created an alternate existence or an alternate history per se, she has created a sub-culture within the known world that is complete with all of the idiosyncrasies, rules, accoutrement, and tools of an individual society.  While the wizarding world is aware of the non-magical world (“muggles” in the book), they work tirelessly to keep themselves unnoticed by people of the non-wizarding sort.

All of these authors have, undoubtedly, set about writing a story and not a philosophical treatise.  Nonetheless, their stories operate within the bounds of a specific metaphysical disposition.  According to Kreeft, we all operate with assumptions about whether reality exists beyond the scope of our own thought, and whether that reality is perceived in its truest sense on a daily basis.[iv] To that end, these authors have led us, wittingly or not, down an important road of philosophical self-discovery.

Entering an Alternate Reality

NarniaWardrobe

To one degree or another, the world of fantasy literature owes its existence to the philosophy of Plato.  He postulated that the world we experience through our physical senses is merely a shadow of the “real” reality that remains out of our perception.  Fantasy literature utilizes this understanding of our existence as its basic premise.  The world we experience is not all that there is in the “real world.”  In the “real world,” we experience all of the things that we cannot experience in our daily lives, because of our clouded perception.  Plato’s Myth of the Cave and his Theory of Forms could ultimately be the sources of this understanding as used in Fantasy literature.

In the Myth of the Cave, Plato imagines a cave where human beings have been held captive since birth.  They are chained down in such a way that they can only see the wall of the cave.  They cannot see the sky, heavens, or each other.  Consequently, the only thing they know about their world comes from the shadows that are cast onto the wall as objects are passed in front of a fire by their captors in the cave.  These shadows, then, are the only means by which the prisoners know reality.

Plato then asks the reader to imagine what it would be like for one of those prisoners, if the captors showed them any of the objects that had been casting shadows on the wall.  Surely, the prisoner would reject the true form of the object as trickery, and, having only ever known the shadows and not expecting anything else to exist beyond them, would insist that the shadows are indeed reality.  Plato then goes through a series of questions asking the reader to imagine what would happen if the prisoner was subsequently (for the first time in their existence) stood up, shown the fire, and taken outside.  Tolkien, Lewis, and Rowling have essentially done just that.  They have created a world that allows us to exit our cave of perception and interact with ideas/objects in their true form (Platonic Forms from here on).

In order for these authors to have substantive interaction with what truly constitutes reality, they would ultimately have to take the reader to a place where Platonic Forms are present alongside (or in some cases in the place of) our mere perception of forms.  Consequently, their worlds are certainly significant literary accomplishments, but also represent a story telling tool that enables the reader to interact with the philosophical quandaries introduced by Plato.  The reader of fantasy literature is able to interrelate with platonic ideas at a much more intuitive level through their interaction with narrative than they would otherwise have the ability to do in some academic setting.  This is ultimately the ageless value and strength of the narrative: ordinary people can become part of complex and important contemplation though they may lack the ability to articulate such concepts in other settings.   Consequently, this will prove to be one of the crucial values of the literary works of authors like Tolkien, Lewis, and Rowling.

As such, each author has /1/ provided a gateway for each reader to enter their world and /2/ created a system of Forms (in the Platonic sense) in order to challenge our thinking and assumptions.[iv] For Tolkien, the gateway is history and he uses items of power to represent Platonic Forms; he provides not only a backdrop for our own reality but also a reality that has eons of its own ancient history.  For Lewis, the gateway is the Wardrobe and he uses talking animals to represent Platonic Forms; he gives the reader an initial point of entry that provides a clear distinction between our world and the other (which is the closest parallel of the three to Plato’s Myth of the Cave).  For Rowling, the gateways are both Platform 9 3/4 and Diagon Alley and she uses magic to represent Platonic Forms; she provides a means to see past the veil of secrecy surrounding a reality hidden from muggle eyes.


[iv] Each author actually incorporates several elements that do the work of Platonic Forms.  However, for the sake of scope and time I have limited this discussion to one of the more prominent elements in each of the author’s writing.

Reed Signature
This is another Onion-style satire piece from my archives. I wrote this around the time the 7th HP book came out. It was another time then–a time of bubbled real estate and safe bets in hedge funds, a time of a successful surge in Iraq when no one had heard of a charismatic junior senator from Illinois. It was a time when fundamentalists had nothing better to do then target their righteous anger (for to be a soldier of God is to, of course, always be angry) at a pre-teen wizard from the suburbs of London. I hope you enjoy it.

AMERICA’S INNOCENCE, MINNEAPOLIS, MN – Confirming the worst fears of many Evangelical Christians across the nation, Harry Potter Book 7 The Deathly Hallows, uncovers the boy wizard’s true identity to be none other then the Morning Star, Satan himself, reincarnated on a broomstick. Apparently, J. K. Rowling’s multi-billion dollar book/movie/toy/candy/fake tattoo franchise was nothing other then an attempt to prepare impressionable childrens’ minds for the Apocalapse.

“If you look at the facts, this revelation was unavoidable,” said a professor of Eschatological Studies at North Central University in Minneapolis, MN. “Harry Potter has a lightning bolt scar on his forehead. There are 11 letters in his name. In 1997, [the year HP was first published] there was a .666% chance a child or someone in his immediate family would be struck by lightning before the age of 11. 666 is the number used by the Antichrist to mark his minions in the Bible. I believe this is a clear indication Harry Potter was meant to represent the Antichrist from the beginning.”

“We knew that boy was up to no good. What with all that magicing, wizarding, and confounded quiditching.”
- Focus On The Family

Despite this unsuspected conclusion, Deathly Hallows [which sold 8.3 million copies its first 24 hours in the US alone] shows no sign of slowing in world circulation, causing an outcry from Christian interests groups across the country.

“We knew that boy was up to no good. What with all that magicing, wizarding, and confounded quiditching,” said Roy Slabstone Focus On The Family representative yesterday morning. “Right from the beginning, that there witchcraft was a subtle attack on the moral fabric of our society.” When asked what his stance was on simply not reading the books if their content made him uncomfortable and leaving everyone else alone, Slabstone frowned quizzically and responded, “but then what would I do all day?”

Yesterday afternoon, Rowling delivered a press release via owl from her Edinburgh home in response to these allegations. “When Mephastophilis first appeared to me 10 years ago and offered to provide me with a bestselling storyline in exchange for my soul, I never thought it would end up like this.”

Hit hardest by the news is Harry Potter publisher Arthur A. Levine Books who were disappointed to discover that in this age of electronic media, nothing less then a black curse cast within the pages of a book will get kids to spend time reading.

A Theology of Sustenance

August 12, 2008

dansig
Alright Gentlemen~

I want to pose a thread that we could turn into an official Theophiliac document. In order for this to work, however, I would appreciate your time and effort in a few responses to this idea. If we decide this topic lacks the interest of the many, we can skip it. If most of us are interested in this subject, let us continue on in its dialogue.

I believe one issue we have not touched, is rarely breached in systematics, is the issue of sustenance. The world as we know it had previously not existed. From the time of nonexistence to the present something happened.

Some people, namely Jeremy, probably believe the whole of something exploded and some atoms or some crap … blah blah blah … spinning, exploding, fire and galaxies … then, Earth.

Some Fundamentalists, ahem … (reed), believe the earth is like, 20 years old and Jesus made it with a magic wand, and since he used a magic wand he had to be punished … then Harry Potter was written and demons were freed … its really complicated, but at the end of it all … Earth.

The whole point is, I would like to hear your view on how the world (cosmos) and existence started, and upon that, your belief of the sustaining of creation (or of the evolutionary system, Jeremy). From this I would like to move, not immediately mind you, to a theology of Sustenance. A belief of what the creator does with the creation; in action, reaction and in lieu of our cultural understandings of god.

Let me know what you think (as response to this post) then please post your own response.

Shoe

**

I am adding a little addendum to this to clarify what it is we are doing in this Sustenance conversation.

Our goal will be to eventually get to the subject of sustenance. I feel this subject will only arrive appropriately as we ease into it through a conversation about origins.

In sustenance I wish to cover a myriad of different subjects concerning an idea: sustenance. This is, we as beings are sustained, or motivated by something other than just the drive to exist as humanity. I admit the subject in itself derives a bit of a conclusion, that one is sustained. I would like to eventually come to this after origins. Again, I labeled this as origins so that we could think along these lines.

I apologize for my lack of clarity. If any further is needed please let me know.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 188 other followers