Flux II: Why Old Stuff Matters
May 29, 2009

“Flux” is a continuing series on my year visiting churches of various Christian traditions.
|
I first experienced Eastern Orthodoxy as a 21-year-old traveling through Ukraine. Even then, the tradition enchanted me. At the time I was interning with a missions organization working in Eastern Europe. I knew that many of the churches we were helping to plant were located in heavily Eastern Orthodox or Roman Catholic areas. It was also become increasingly clear that these traditions were undoubtedly Christian, perhaps in some ways even more Christian than me. So why are we evangelizing Christians? I wondered.
It was the opening spark of a lesson that took me a few years to learn: old stuff matters.
By “old stuff,” I mean the bulk of the ancient practices and symbols many modern Evangelicals (both intentionally and unintentionally) learned to de-emphasize or ignore. In my studies, I realized there were a number of questions I’d never fully explored: where did the Bible come from? who first outlined concepts like the dual-natures of Christ and the Trinity? what is our modern conception of hell based on? Many of the answers to these questions were found in studying the first few centuries of Christianity, an area of scholarship sometimes called Patristics or a little more broadly, Christian Origins.
I learned that whether one recited the creeds in church or not, they were formative and part of our shared Christian heritage. Whether one appreciated liturgy or found it dull, it was influential in shaping modern forms of worship. I learned that Sacramental theology left a precedent for how we expected to experience God–even if one didn’t look for Him in Eucharist anymore. Most importantly I learned that issues like church governance, division, authority, human sexuality and the role of the Church in the world were problems as old as Pentecost.
Perhaps most poignantly, however, I was struck by how bewitching the tradional forms of worship could be. The ancient liturgies enchanted me, the Icons arrested me–I felt myself being pulled into something older and bigger and altogether more enveloping than my previous, more individualistic Church experiences had been. All my life, I had endeavored to maintain the right belief or “Apostolicity*” of my faith. But it wasn’t until my year of visiting Churches, that I was first introduced to its commanility or “Catholicity**.”
* (Apostolicity in this case, just means the faith of Apostles, or what was handed down to us.)
** (Catholic not in the Roman sense, but in it’s older meaning of ‘universal’ or ‘entirety).
Standing Silent in an Orthodox Pew
August 6, 2008

I had the sincere pleasure of attending my first Antiochene Orthodox mass yesterday. My wife attended the service with me so the entire experience was mixed with the desire to observe the rites as they took place and lean to my right every three or four minutes to check and make sure I hadn’t said anything stupid.
—
The mass began with a singing of the Psalms in Arabic and English. The sensation of hearing the Palestinian language sung by Palestinians (at the very least, those around the area) brought an immediate sense of disconnect from the St. Paul background. I felt on some level I was being placed in a time outside of the suburban St. Paul, a time outside of time.
As the voices behind us rose, a melodic confession of deep theological dogma began tickling my ears, swelling deep within my psyche. The priest would sing aloud a confession, to be enhanced, or agreed upon by the echoing voices of the chorus elevated behind us. I personally recognized many of the words sung, however the experience of song brought the exuberance of the creeds to brighter awareness within me.
I followed along with the mass to the best of my ability. Between my palms laid a sort of spiritual playbill, so I could know what to expect and attempt to be prepared for its alloted time. As in most services, I expected the demeanor of the audience to fade greatly. Curiously enough among the anachronistic crowd I saw no eye gaze to a watch, sleepy heads or thumb twiddling. The attendees stood firm, exited and utterly joyful through even the slightly longer homily (long for liturgical standards, I later found the priest has a pentecostal heritage).
Then came the amalgamation of our proliferation. We were to come forward to intake the bread and the cup. Voices began to rise, the temperature in the room, which had been surprisingly cool, began to steam. Then as people began to step forward I remembered who I was, where I was … and what I was not. My feet were nailed to the ground, my eyes glued upon the rejoicing and the celebration of the congregation as the climax of their week finally came to pass.
—
I am denied penance in the catholic church, roman and orthodox. I cannot call myself baptized in faith, for my baptism was inauthentic. I cannot celebrate in the redemption offered by my savior by taking in his blood and body as it was meant for me. I am, to speak anachronistically, a pagan.
But I have been baptized and I meant it: god, my authority has seen my faith. I have confessed my sins: god, my authority has heard it. I have accepted the offer of redemption and would gladly celebrate in any forum offered: god, my authority has felt it.
Why does the authority of the orthodox church dictate that which only the god can?

