Charismatic Apologetics in St. Athanasius
August 19, 2010
A passage to which I imagine I will return for more reflection struck me as interesting on a few levels.
“What we have said is, indeed, no small proof of the destruction of death and of the fact that the cross of the Lord is the monument to His victory. But the resurrection of the body to immortality, which results henceforward from the work of Christ, the common Savior and true Life of all, is more effectively proved by facts than by words to those whose mental vision is sound. For, if, as we have shown, death was destroyed and everybody tramples on it because of Christ, how much more did He Himself first trample and destroy it in His own body! Death having been slain by Him, then, what other issue could there be than the resurrection of His body and its open demonstration as the monument of His victory? How could the destruction of death have been manifested at all, had not the Lord’s body been raised? But if anyone finds even this insufficient, let him find proof of what has been said in present facts.
Dead men cannot take effective action; their power of influence on others lasts only till the grave. Deeds and actions that energize others belong only to the living. Well, then, look at the facts in this case. The Savior is working mightily among men, every day He is invisibly persuading numbers of people all over the world, both within and beyond the Greek-speaking world, to accept His faith and be obedient to His teaching. Can anyone, in face of this, still doubt that He has risen and lives, or rather that He is Himself the Life? Does a dead man prick the consciences of men, so that they throw all the traditions of their fathers to the winds and bow down before the teaching of Christ?
If He is no longer active in the world, as He must needs be if He is dead, how is it that He makes the living to cease from their activities, the adulterer from his adultery, the murderer from murdering, the unjust from avarice, while the profane and godless man becomes religious? If He did not rise, but is still dead, how is it that He routs and persecutes and overthrows the false gods, whom unbelievers think to be alive, and the evil spirits whom they worship? For where Christ is named, idolatry is destroyed and the fraud of evil spirits is exposed; indeed, no such spirit can endure that Name, but takes to flight on sound of it. This is the work of One Who lives, not of one dead; and, more than that, it is the work of God. It would be absurd to say that the evil spirits whom He drives out and the idols which He destroys are alive, but that He Who drives out and destroys, and Whom they themselves acknowledge to be Son of God, is dead.”
There’s a lot to unpack here and I don’t have time to do it but I want to draw attention to how St. Athanasius sees “proof” of Christ’s resurrection in his charismatic work; converting people from paganism; converting their habits and lives; casting out demons, et. al.
“My Father is still working, and I am working” indeed!
“Why Didn’t They Teach Us That In Church?”
March 25, 2009
I must admit to being distraught today. At some point I would like to offer a full reflection on the things I am learning in my Philosophy course which have shown me how Christian thought is percieved in the public square.
But today something happened in class which I was not really ready for and which really stirred me. Especially since it brought to mind a similar situation which had happened in another class I had been in.
Today we were just finishing up our lectures on David Hume. Most of the class (including me) dug his good Scotish Empirical skepticism on the ability of pure Reason to deliver the goods. But we also went through his “History of Religions” scheme, which I found completely pathetic ala Lyotard, but it obviously had had an effect on a young 17 year old girl in the back. Keep in mind that we are also finishing up the section on Theistic proofs and Free Will vs Determinism.
For the last 10 minutes of class the professor asked various people in the room what they thought of Hume’s proposals. (My professor is an interesting story as well, son of an E Free pastor who went to Wheaton for Philosophy, then Belgium for grad work in Phenomenology, who now is an agnostic) It came around to a sweet looking girl in the back who when asked seemed reticent to respond. She found it difficult to say, but almost spontaneously she told the class that the entire Course so far, and this in particular, had really been making her question her faith. She said:
“You know, you just go through life for 17 years believing something, like the Bible or whatever, and this is all so very confusing. I’ve been asking my Pastor about all this…”
Here before my very eyes was a young girl struggling to hold on to a faith that she had had for her whole life. A few things happened for me at once. I recalled my own transition from Fundamentalism to Whatever-I-am-now. There were times when I would walk to the park on fall down weeping fearing that my faith was gone, that I couldn’t muster up one ounce enough to keep me going. I recalled the sheer terror of that time (not that I don’t still struggle with things) and I know that I am a lucky one. I was able to come out the other side with a tiny piece of stronger faith; but for every one like me there are countless who can’t make it – they are never able to recover from the sense of assurity that they once had; most leave completely, some migrate to the Mainline and hope that the Liturgy can hold their shreds together. (Which is why you should never judge a liberal. If you were to scratch just below the surface you will inevitably find a disolussioned Evangelical who would love to “go back,” but they can’t. And they probably have a faith baptized in fire that a conservative could never have)
It also made me recall my advanced Textual Criticism class. For bible-centric folk, to learn about the thousands of manuscripts and their variations and histories, it can be a struggle as well. I remember one girl in that class, a Pastor’s kid (and now my 2nd cousin-in-law), who said:
“Why didn’t they teach us this in Church?”
I wanted to reach out to this girl in my Philosophy class. I wanted to tell her what I had been through, that it was all gonna be ok. But I don’t know that it will all be ok for her. And to be frank, if one never goes through these crisis’ of faith, I don’t know that we will ever grow at all.
I had always heard that people go off to the scary public universities and fall away from faith. The blame was always left at the feet of the Universities. I wonder if maybe we should be looking closer to home. Our catechism classes and Bible study’s need to be able to account for the advances in Scholarship and we need to openly discuss critiques of the Christian faith so that our kids can have a bit of preparation for life beyond the quaint Pizza and Soda parties of Youth Group.
Tony Hunt
jstambaugh
Shawn Wamsley
