The Difference Music Makes

February 25, 2010

Saw this and decided you all needed to see it, because I couldn’t stop laughing.  It’s amazing how the scene takes on a different meaning when you change the soundtrack – what was surely an emotional, ecstatic situation looks like something Dante would write about.  Hilarious {Sorry for the double-post, Tony – you can drop it in post order if you like, but you guys had to see this, now}

Reed Signature
A simple google search for “post evangelical” will return a plethora of commentary on the term (some of my favorites: the very straight forward wikipedia entry, the standby internetmonk, an open source theology thread from 2003, and our fellow ccblogger notes from off center).

It would be very silly of me to launch into a comprehensive series of posts on the idea when so much has already been explained by those more capable (and internet savvy). However, the term displays prominently at the top of our blog right next to ‘tea party’ as if we all sit around counting doilies and discussing Mr. Darcy all day long and as far as I can tell, we’ve never actually sussed out just what that means.

I am especially guilty since it would seem I consistently use this slippery word as an adjective for my position on various issues right now and just smile coyly to myself as people sitting across from me as they scramble to figure out if that’s a postmodern, emergent, postdenomentational missional thing or whether I just made it up on the spot. (In truth, it gives me an inherent sense of superiority to be “post” whatever the person is whom I’m discussing things with. Post-girlfriend anyone?)

For some odd reason probably having something to do with either Shawn Wamsley or my slick redo of our sidebar, our traffic has increased in recent weeks and I’m delighted that many of our new readers and commenters come from worldviews outside the Christian sphere. If you’re new and reading this, I hope this post is useful for you.

Everyone who contributes to this blog came to Christianity in an Evangelical movement in the United States. None of us have remained.

This is the simplest use of the term on this blog and if nothing I say after makes any sense, I suggest we just stick to it. Some of us have found new movements to join, some have left conventional Christianity altogether and others are lost somewhere in the clouds.

Our reasons for leaving are as variable as our tastes in beer, which is to say, surprisingly not quite so varied—however, full of tiny quirks unique to our own persons. Shamelessly borrowing formatting from the wikipedia article because I’m on vacation and too tired to be creative on my own, I’d like to list some of these frustrations to which many of us can attest (I’ve also decided to add Exclamation points because most of us live in Minnesota where people really don’t show enough emotion):

1. Politicization of Faith!
The G Dub years were hard for me. I was a loyal supporter before I could even vote but by the end of his eight year reign, I couldn’t figure out why people kept telling me he was Christian, and why that necessarily meant I had to vote for him. An astute reader of the blog might observe that we still discuss our political convictions using Christian rationale, just often from the other pole. I would counter that such explanations are often more complicated than simple blind “good vs. evil” comparisons and that likely a particular politician we might support involves our reasoning of “shared goals” rather than “shared convictions.”

2. Unreasonable view of Scripture!
One of the two issues on this blog that will never quite go away. I don’t have much to add here. Look around, you’ll find it.

3. Inadequate Response to Homosexual Christians!
The other of the two issues that is never far from our recent comments list. There are a variety of stances on this issue on our blog—which is something, I’m proud of.

4. Militant Exclusivism and Preoccupation with Eschatology!
For those of us who grew up in a church or movement with a vibrant missions or Evangelistic focus, this issue remains difficult. Just what does it mean to share the good news? Am I accountable if I don’t “witness” to every single person I meet? Does hell exist? Are Christians the only people who go to “heaven.” And just what is heaven? And hey, what about my Muslim friends, I like them and I think that their faith is pretty cool and I’d rather they don’t change to be completely honest. Can God make a rock so big he can’t lift it?

5. Emphasis on Personal Piety over Social Responsibility!
Disgusted by mega church opulence and prosperity nonsense, post evangelicals are afflicted by the tension between holiness and justice. Maybe those hippies who joined the Peace Corps instead of the missions trip were on to something. And seriously, just how does my memorizing another scripture verse help people dying from Malaria in Africa?

6. Disconnect From Church History!
I’ve discussed this elsewhere. Old stuff matters and Evangelicals seemed determined to separate themselves from it.

7. Separatism and Alternative Culture!
More a personal pet peeve of mine. I can’t stand alternative Christian culture, music, movies, books etc… I find it to be a cheesy and crude attempt at unnecessary and harmful separation from “the world.” Seriously, why are Christians so weird?

8. Other Stuff!
Which I’m sure you guys will add in the comments.

Finally adding “tea party” to our blog tag line was really a throwaway thing I did when first designing the site. I suppose you could say its lighthearted or a reference to our mutual friendships and enjoyment of imbibing things but really, I just threw it in there on a whim.

A Subtle Contrast

May 20, 2009

Where are my pants?

 

People down near the front of the arena rise to their feet when the lights begin fading quickly to black. Instinctively you stand as well, happy to be up since you’ve been seated for over thirty minutes. Then a hush moves over the crowd. The moment they’ve all been waiting for is now becoming a reality, and your curiosity only builds.

In the absence of light your mind’s eye is left with the reverse image of what little you’ve been able to observe up until this point. Mainly, a crowd of people and a large black curtain across the entire width of the stage. So, not much.

With nothing left to distract you, the possibilities race through your mind. You wonder, is this some sort of seminar, or maybe a concert? Is it a multi-level marketing sales pitch? A fashion show? “Please, don’t let it be a fashion show.” 

The black curtain, it now appears, is actually somewhat translucent, and a single spotlight at center stage comes up slowly. As it grows stronger it sweeps forward to silhouette a lone figure approaching the audience. He stops when the glint of a microphone blinks into existence from the void. A momentary pause brings the tension to the breaking point. 

Anticipating that your wait is almost over, you think back to the details of your assignment. All you knew ahead of time is that you were going to be in a large crowd and that the people around you were not going to speak the same language as you. That’s one variable that had to be established, so you would have to rely strictly on what you observed. Talking to others would be cheating.

Then your train of thought is brought to an abrupt halt. 

Four clicks, barely audible in the large space, are the only signal the audience needs. Hands shoot into the air as the first downbeat resounds thick and heavy. You jump at the sound, and at the sight of the crowd suddenly awash in every spectral hue from a dozen angles. The lights sweep back and forth across the crowd as the remaining stage lights slowly come up, revealing a full band, the source of the pulsing music. The brass cymbals and silver edges of the drums, the highly polished guitars and bass, even the keyboard seems to come alive as they reflect the pulsing lights in every direction, showering the arena with enormous multi-colored sparks of color.

You, for one, are relieved. There was an outside chance this was going to be a self-help seminar. And the fact that the music is actually pretty good is a welcome development, even though it’s nothing you’re familiar with.

wait for it...Now the lights all begin to sweep up front, drawing everyones eyes toward center stage once again. The curtain falls dramatically as the leader steps forward with a commanding stride, then lets his guitar fall to the side and takes the mic out of the stand in one smooth motion. With one hand in the air he brings the music down and all the lights fade until only the bright white spots behind him remain.

Then he begins to sing and the strobe lights kick in, pulsing with the backbeat and framing snapshots of the singer and musicians as they work through the first verse. By the time the music begins to build toward the chorus the entire place is jumping with the beat. The red lights come up first, followed by blue and violet, and you notice that even now there are people being moved to tears. 

You feel something deep inside of you and decide that even though you have no idea who the band is, you may as well go with the flow. Your hands go up, you bob your head to the beat, and a smile stretches across your face.

Everything feels good. Better than good. Great. No, fantastic. 

Song after song goes by in a similar fashion, with lighting and smoke effects timed perfectly to accent the rise and fall of the bands dynamics. It would have been nearly impossible not to be taken in by the music and the experience of it all, and you have to admit that you’ve been moved. 

Rock show.
By the end of the set, the people around you are visibly exhausted, but in spite of this their faces beam with ecstasy as they seem to recount memorable moments from the concert. You don’t know what they’re saying, but you can guess.

They’ve all had a collective experience that you know could not be replaced by any sound or video recording. It was real and it was exciting.

The question is: What, exactly, did you just experience?

Obviously this was a concert, but what kind of concert? Without knowing what they were singing, do you have any way of knowing whether this was any old rock band, or a worship service? And would that, or should that, have an impact on how you interpret the emotions you have been lead through during the course of the evening?

* * *

This is where I feel stuck. Personally, most of the ‘religious’ experiences I’ve had have been a part of a concert experience. Whether at a church or at a concert venue, in a backyard strumming acoustic guitars with friends or on a stage with a full band and lighting; these are the times I’ve felt closest to God.

Some people say they can feel God’s presence as they walk through the woods, as if he is present in nature for them. This doesn’t work for me. Other people tell me that God’s presence surrounds them as they study the Bible, or when they are with their family and loved ones, or when they are serving the homeless and needy at a local shelter. Still others feel God’s presence by simply walking into their home church. 

As for me, I have to say these feelings have always been tied to music. Whether I’m playing in the band or swaying with the crowd, a good concert really moves me, and that feeling just doesn’t happen at any other time.

But one day it struck me; I’ve felt the same way as I walked out of a rock show as I have as I walked out of a night of worship, like they hosted back at North Central on Wednesday nights. I’ve had the same enthralling, ecstatic emotions that stayed with me as I drove home. And the thing that troubles me is I would be hard pressed to describe the difference between the religious and the secular concert, between the sacred and the profane, as it were.

I guess I’m just left wondering what this means. It’s like I could stop going to church altogether and still “feel” just as close to God so long as I see a good rock show every once in a while. Does that cheapen the ‘religious’ experience, or heighten the ‘secular’ one? Or is there any difference in the first place? Does this have anything to do with God at all, or is it just emotional manipulation though a collective musical experience no matter what kind of music it is?

What do you think?

 

{P.S. I feel like it’s worth pointing out that I have felt the same sensation during a well done orchestral concert or piano-lead hymn session. I just want to be clear that this is not a ‘beat’ driven thing for me.}

Reed Signature
As a self-styled post-evangelical, I’ve studied the rise and rise of the megas for much of my life. My last post was admittedly tongue-in-cheek. This one will hopefully contribute a little more to the discussion. Put simply, I believe there are at least three emphases unique to North American styled Evangelicals that make them particularly prone to build mega churches.

1. The Local Church as The Church Universal

It’s not that Evangelicals don’t have Ecclesiology… it’s that they have too many.

Free, nondenominational, open etc… the unique independent spirit of Evangelical churches give each parish the opportunity to form its own identity. As our regular commenter Quickbeam has pointed out, this notion of the local body as somehow independent of the larger body is a relatively new distinction in church history.

The Reformation took theological pondering out of the hands of the religious elite and gave it to the trained priests/pastors who led the people “out on the front lines” so to speak. This movement was compounded by the North American spirit of individualism, where any literate person with a Bible and an opinion could challenge the authority of the Pope.

This breaking off of religious identity (while arguably necessary) has resulted in the severe fragmentation in Protestant churches we see today. Now individuals, liberated from the contraints of a history/tradition/denomination (so they think) are free to interpret the purposes of the One Holy Catholic Apostolic Church through their individual actions in their specific community. Essentially what one used to expect from the Church Universal (reaching out to certain cultures, age groups, geographic regions) can now be expected from each individual community (so we have churches with multiple styled-worship services, multiple campuses and huge budgets for a variety of programs). Thus: a small congregation failing to achieve the broad mission of the Church Universal must be abandoned for a larger, more accomplished body.

2. Trading in the “Ancient” for the “Relevant”

Evangelicals often view traditional aspects of Christianity suspiciously, seeing them as an optional “worship style” rather than an integral part of our identity in Christ.

As a high schooler I thought of the Nicene Creed as a dry pleasantry attached to an overly structured liturgy. The irony was that I defended some of it’s tenants vehemently against my “liberal” ELCA friends, all the while understanding less about its origins than they did.

It’s no mystery that Evangelicals have put a heavy emphasis on soteriology (the study of how one is ‘saved’) and its no new criticism that they’ve downplayed other undertakings like ecclesiology (the study of the church) or pneumatology (the study of the Holy Spirit). However, this particular emphasis on the basics of “how to be saved” has resulted in many Evangelicals believing that everything else is a matter of personal preference.

Many believe that how one is saved is primarily an issue of what is believed about metaphysical ideas or what one has confessed in a moment of conversion. This gives incredible freedom in the realms of how one can act or worship. We see this freedom most poignantly in the unique Evangelical emphasis on “church growth” principles over “Church being” principles.

Here, Relevance becomes a new value, since things that are “relevant” to people (READ: what sells) are much more likely to get their attention. Making this core, sanded down belief “sellable” so to speak, is the prime goal. Since North America is a largely consumer oriented culture of luxury services and high-tech goods, it follows that megachurches are in the best position to provide what is “relevant.”

3. Distinguishing Between The Converted and Unconverted

While its human nature to draw lines between ‘us’ and ‘them’, Evangelicals are in the unique position of drawing their lines on invisible criteria.

Many large churches today publish member lists. A few actually publish church ‘yellow pages’ where one can find a Christian banker, a Christian doctor or a Christian plumber to do business with.

James Bromley’s post was largely fiction, but his stats were dead on. I believe that the rise of megachurches is a direct defensive response to the overall decrease in the total number of Christians. They will continue clustering as the Christian influence fades in the secular world.

Rather than belonging to a tradition as in the Eastern Church, a central authority as in the Roman Church, or a communion as in the mythical Anglican church, Evangelicals belong to each other based on the extent to which they can agree theologically. For the most part, this agreement has little evidence other than what can be teased out in a discussion so other means of distinction must be used. This can vary from the books and music one buys, to the movies one watches, to the big one, where one decides to attend on a Sunday morning.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 188 other followers