<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are We Reading The Same Book?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theophiliacs.com/2009/03/30/are-we-reading-the-same-book/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theophiliacs.com/2009/03/30/are-we-reading-the-same-book/</link>
	<description>amiable. anglican. awesome.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 05:06:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shaun</title>
		<link>http://theophiliacs.com/2009/03/30/are-we-reading-the-same-book/#comment-2442</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shaun]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 22:10:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theophiliacs.com/?p=2271#comment-2442</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think this explanation might be helpful. It&#039;s called Can We Understand the Bible? http://community-bible.org/podcast/?p=93]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this explanation might be helpful. It&#8217;s called Can We Understand the Bible? <a href="http://community-bible.org/podcast/?p=93" rel="nofollow">http://community-bible.org/podcast/?p=93</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George P. Wood</title>
		<link>http://theophiliacs.com/2009/03/30/are-we-reading-the-same-book/#comment-1950</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[George P. Wood]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 17:27:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theophiliacs.com/?p=2271#comment-1950</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jeremy:

LOL. I thought you might get a laugh out of my little two-word joke. (And it was a joke!)

On a more serious note, if Aristotle read your question--&quot;who the heck gets to choose what makes a belief system coherent?&quot;--he would ask several questions:

1. Is this a rhetorical question or a real one?
2. If it is a rhetorical question, is its implied answer, &quot;No one&quot;?
3. If its implied answer is, &quot;No one,&quot; we can rightly ask a similar question of you: &quot;Who the heck gave you the authority to decide that no one can choose what makes a belief system coherent?&quot;
4. If the question is a real, as oppposed to a rhetorical, question, then shouldn&#039;t you be open to the possibility that someone might get to choose what makes a belief system coherent?

If the answer to Aristotle&#039;s 4th question is yes, then I would add a 5th question:

5. Why not me? Or Tony? Or you, for that matter? Who&#039;s to foreclose the option that one of us--or all of us, after we&#039;ve put our heads together--can identify the criteria for determining a belief system&#039;s coherence?

George]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeremy:</p>
<p>LOL. I thought you might get a laugh out of my little two-word joke. (And it was a joke!)</p>
<p>On a more serious note, if Aristotle read your question&#8211;&#8221;who the heck gets to choose what makes a belief system coherent?&#8221;&#8211;he would ask several questions:</p>
<p>1. Is this a rhetorical question or a real one?<br />
2. If it is a rhetorical question, is its implied answer, &#8220;No one&#8221;?<br />
3. If its implied answer is, &#8220;No one,&#8221; we can rightly ask a similar question of you: &#8220;Who the heck gave you the authority to decide that no one can choose what makes a belief system coherent?&#8221;<br />
4. If the question is a real, as oppposed to a rhetorical, question, then shouldn&#8217;t you be open to the possibility that someone might get to choose what makes a belief system coherent?</p>
<p>If the answer to Aristotle&#8217;s 4th question is yes, then I would add a 5th question:</p>
<p>5. Why not me? Or Tony? Or you, for that matter? Who&#8217;s to foreclose the option that one of us&#8211;or all of us, after we&#8217;ve put our heads together&#8211;can identify the criteria for determining a belief system&#8217;s coherence?</p>
<p>George</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: adhunt</title>
		<link>http://theophiliacs.com/2009/03/30/are-we-reading-the-same-book/#comment-1949</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[adhunt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 16:56:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theophiliacs.com/?p=2271#comment-1949</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jeremy,

Really it was just a jest.  I&#039;m sorry if I offended you.  I have read your comments with great care and have learned a lot about you.  I was not patently dismissing you, merely a joke.

Tony]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeremy,</p>
<p>Really it was just a jest.  I&#8217;m sorry if I offended you.  I have read your comments with great care and have learned a lot about you.  I was not patently dismissing you, merely a joke.</p>
<p>Tony</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jhgharineh</title>
		<link>http://theophiliacs.com/2009/03/30/are-we-reading-the-same-book/#comment-1948</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jhgharineh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 16:25:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theophiliacs.com/?p=2271#comment-1948</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tom,
Thank you for the discussion, your tone and input were quite refreshing.

George,
I forgot that Aristotle was refering to you when he postulated about the unmoved mover. I will give you this, you are definately obstinate.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom,<br />
Thank you for the discussion, your tone and input were quite refreshing.</p>
<p>George,<br />
I forgot that Aristotle was refering to you when he postulated about the unmoved mover. I will give you this, you are definately obstinate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George P. Wood</title>
		<link>http://theophiliacs.com/2009/03/30/are-we-reading-the-same-book/#comment-1947</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[George P. Wood]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 04:30:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theophiliacs.com/?p=2271#comment-1947</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jeremy:

I know you asked Tony who makes the decision whether a belief system is coherent, but I thought I&#039;d answer anyway.

I do.

George]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeremy:</p>
<p>I know you asked Tony who makes the decision whether a belief system is coherent, but I thought I&#8217;d answer anyway.</p>
<p>I do.</p>
<p>George</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: quickbeamoffangorn</title>
		<link>http://theophiliacs.com/2009/03/30/are-we-reading-the-same-book/#comment-1946</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[quickbeamoffangorn]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 03:53:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theophiliacs.com/?p=2271#comment-1946</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jeremy,

Your sound like your more influenced by Kierkegaard then I thougth initially. Well I think my input has run it&#039;s course. I&#039;m pretty set &amp; happy with my phyisophical assumptions and nothing against you but I would feel like I was in literal hell if I had to deal with your assumptions.

I wish you well in this and you have my prayers and ask for yours.

Tom]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeremy,</p>
<p>Your sound like your more influenced by Kierkegaard then I thougth initially. Well I think my input has run it&#8217;s course. I&#8217;m pretty set &amp; happy with my phyisophical assumptions and nothing against you but I would feel like I was in literal hell if I had to deal with your assumptions.</p>
<p>I wish you well in this and you have my prayers and ask for yours.</p>
<p>Tom</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jhgharineh</title>
		<link>http://theophiliacs.com/2009/03/30/are-we-reading-the-same-book/#comment-1945</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jhgharineh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 01:37:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theophiliacs.com/?p=2271#comment-1945</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tony,
With all love intended, who the heck gets to choose what makes a belief system coherent? I know your statement was in jest, but it seems a bit off color to me considering the candor and vulnerability I have expressed in this conversation. I don&#039;t mean to overreact, but it bugs me when anyone patently dismisses a persons perspective as incoherant or illogical without addressing the critiques that said position has offered. 

Tom,
To quickly respond to your last question, I am saying that it is impossible to determine whether incarnational theology is normatively &quot;true&quot;. So it follows that I don&#039;t believe a universal litmus for truth can be made from said theology. One can apply its truth relatively to their lives but they cannot make a universal mandate based upon it. As far as professing Christianity, the list of reasons is far too long to express at this juncture.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tony,<br />
With all love intended, who the heck gets to choose what makes a belief system coherent? I know your statement was in jest, but it seems a bit off color to me considering the candor and vulnerability I have expressed in this conversation. I don&#8217;t mean to overreact, but it bugs me when anyone patently dismisses a persons perspective as incoherant or illogical without addressing the critiques that said position has offered. </p>
<p>Tom,<br />
To quickly respond to your last question, I am saying that it is impossible to determine whether incarnational theology is normatively &#8220;true&#8221;. So it follows that I don&#8217;t believe a universal litmus for truth can be made from said theology. One can apply its truth relatively to their lives but they cannot make a universal mandate based upon it. As far as professing Christianity, the list of reasons is far too long to express at this juncture.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

